Georgetown: Introducing blatant dishonesty and lies during a special meeting of the Permanent Council of the Organisation of American States (OAS) on Tuesday Former Foreign Affairs Minister Dr Karen Cummings in a campaign to bury the national vote recount which show a win for the opposition deemed the report produced by a high-level team from CARICOM as a “fallacy”.
Meanwhile, the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) has again refuted claims by the de facto Government of President David Granger that CARICOM and other international Governments and organisations are interfering in Guyana’s internal affairs.
An agent for Granger’s Coalition has moved to appeal a clear High Court decision which upheld the recount as valid and said the Chief Elections Officer must abide by the direction he is given to prepare a report in keeping with the results from the recount so a declaration of the winner of the elections can be made.
But the Coalition, backed by Granger, doesn’t want the recount results to be used; they want the report prepared by the Chief Elections Officer, which included votes fraudulently tabulated to be used. That would give them victory instead of the Opposition People’s Progressive Party (PPP).
Meanwhile, St Vincent’s Ambassador Lou-Anne Gaylene Gilchrist, who spoke on behalf of other CARICOM states, said that all CARICOM is doing is fulfilling the requirements of the agreement that all members states, including Guyana, signed.
CARICOM and rest of the international community have been calling for the results of the national vote recount be declared.
The recount shows that Granger’s APNU+AFC lost the seat of Government. But the President has refused to step aside. In repeated moves to the court, agents of his Coalition APNU+AFC are seeking to bury the recount and have a fraudulent tabulation used so Granger and his Government can stay in power.
Ambassador Gilchrist said CARICOM has been monitoring with concern the political tension in Guyana and noted that both the former chair and the current chair of CARICOM have called for a declaration based on the national recount.
The Ambassador’s statement followed that of Foreign Affairs Minister Dr Karen Cummings who said the international community should “not seek to influence unduly the constitutional and legal processes which are currently ongoing in Guyana.”
Ambassador Gilchrist noted that CARICOM was invited to play a role in the elections when a dispute arose over the tabulation process. That dispute arose when District Four Returning Officer Clairmont Mingo used an unlawful process to tabulate the figures on the Statements of Poll from each of the polling stations in his District.
It was clear that he had inflated figures for the APNU+AFC to guarantee it victory after it became obvious that it would be impossible for them to win the elections when declarations were made in the nine other electoral districts.
Ambassador Gilchrist noted that the CARICOM team scrutinised the recount of all votes and it was on that basis that former Chair Mia Mottley and current Chair Dr Ralph Gonsalves have called for a declaration based on the recount.
The envoy noted therefore that CARICOM’s role is not interference in the domestic affairs of a foreign country, it is participation in community affairs, which is the essence of the revised CARICOM treaty and the Charter of Civil Society.
“We in CARICOM underscore that in our concerted efforts to assist Guyana, our willingness to help resides in our desire to reach a peaceful solution and not to widen the current division. We urge the relevant authorities in Guyana and all stakeholders to respect the rule of law…,” Ambassador Gilchrist stated.
In playing a role in Guyana’s elections, Ambassador Gilchrist said CARICOM is doing no more than carrying out the requirements of the Charter of Civil Society which was agreed to by all member states on February 19, 1997.
That Charter, at Article VI under the heading Political Rights, states: “The States shall ensure the existence of a fair and open democratic system through the holding of free elections at reasonable intervals, by secret ballot, underpinned by an electoral system in which all can have confidence and which will ensure the free expression of the will of the people in the choice of their representatives.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.